Question
Should Home contributors — whose work is creative engagement, not canonical extension — be eligible for Team membership? What's the principled distinction, and does it hold up as Home content becomes a substantial share of activity?
Why it's a real question
Teams steward canon. Home is a creative-engagement surface, not a canonical-extension surface. The cleanest answer is "no" — but it cuts off a category of long-tenured, deeply-invested contributors from local governance. The nuance bears community deliberation.