Gap Register
G-013Public

Commons proposal workflow specifics

Tier 3 — Known unknowns worth scheduling
Status
Open — not started
Owner
Creator

SLA, reviewer assignment, rejection reasons, resubmission rules, appeal timing — implementation details under the constitutional commitment.

Why this matters

The Constitution specifies that Commons proposals exist; implementation details — SLA, reviewer assignment, rejection reasons, resubmission rules, appeal timing — are undefined.

Workflow design is where good intentions either survive or die. A Commons proposal that languishes for weeks without acknowledgment is functionally rejected. A reviewer assignment that gives the same Franchise Team admin everything is functionally an admin-fiefdom. SLAs and reviewer-rotation mechanics deserve concrete defaults that Franchise Teams can adjust within bounds.

Your read on this

Anonymous reactions are accepted; signing in lets you change yours.