Gap Register
G-025Public

LoreLines governance specifics

Tier 2 — Structurally thin, not launch-blocking
Status
Open — partial framing in Entry 010
Owner
Creator
Why now
LoreLines is decided as a first-class contribution surface and the interpretive graph layer. Several governance specifics still need design.
Depends on
G-013, G-012

Persistence under canon change, Credit weights, correction-to-Commons promotion, citation-in-Commons mechanics, Featured LoreLines, type-specific governance.

Why this matters

LoreLines is decided as a first-class contribution surface and the interpretive graph layer (Entry 010). Still open:

  • Persistence and canon change — when canon shifts, what happens to LoreLines attached to old facts? (Default lean: archive with re-anchor offer to author.)
  • Specific Credit weights and quality-signal formulas
  • Promotion pathway from “correction” LoreLine to formal Commons proposal
  • Citation-in-Commons-proposal mechanics — do cited LoreLines earn additional Credit?
  • Featured LoreLines — what authority does a Franchise Team have to elevate specific commentary, and what transparency requirements apply?
  • Type-specific governance differences (annotation vs theory vs correction)

Related

  • Entry 010 — LoreLines as Third Contribution Surface
  • G-013 — Commons proposal workflow specifics
  • G-012 — Canon version control over time

Your read on this

Anonymous reactions are accepted; signing in lets you change yours.