Specific waterfall percentages, Franchise distribution formulas, R&D pool governance, free-rider treatment.
Why this matters
Entry 004 commits the principle: a transparent revenue waterfall — infrastructure, R&D pool, Franchise distribution, then excess governed by Need-vs-Greed. The specifics still need design and constitutional drafting:
- Specific percentages at each waterfall stage
- Whether Franchise distribution is uniform or proportional (by traffic, contributor count, or some other signal)
- Free-rider question: should a Franchise that also runs no membership/sponsorship still receive Network distribution
- R&D pool governance — Council-only? Community proposals? Annual budget?